Hello there, this is the creator of Topibaaz speaking, I am called, “Ammar akhter khan”. Amidst the chaos of the Pandemic, I started this blog/social media infotainment website called Topibaaz. However, I did not have enough time to introduce myself. As my Amazon bio says, Ammar Khan is a nerdy researcher, intricate novelist, and a picky traveler, his books are published on Amazon and he has also presented his various research papers at international conferences. Not only this Ammar Khan has an academic writing course that is present on Udemy for beginners, along with it, if you are interested in data analysis, do delve into other courses that I had published on my Udemy account. Just search my full name on Google, “ammar akhter khan”, and I am an open book. Additionally, Ammar is a Pro-earth and mainly focused on global issues and research related to the solution to Global warming, Poverty eradication, Provision of education, and introduction of new technologies in the World.

I have recently published a novel called Triviality – science fiction. Along with it, my other writings are Hitler’s Nephew, the oblivion of Affection, A slash b normal, and Jibran of India. Also, do read the short stories that I had published on Topibaaz, especially, “the last cigarette that I lit” which is not yet completed, but soon I will be able to complete the story. Anyways, I have long-term goals to serve humanity, whether I use my education as my tool or my knowledge, or my content. Say good luck to me!

We had been struck with a huge tragedy of Titan sumarsible that was designed and developed by the OceanGate Inc, but before getting into the depth of the tragedy, lets compare the submarine and the submarsible and how these two are very different from each other.

A submersible and a submarine are both types of underwater vessels, but they have some key differences in terms of design, purpose, and capabilities.

1. Design:

• Submersibles are usually smaller and more compact compared to submarines. They are often single-person or small crewed vehicles designed for exploration, research, or deep-sea diving.
• Submarines, on the other hand, are larger and capable of carrying a crew and cargo. They are designed for military purposes, such as warfare, surveillance, and strategic missions.

1. Purpose:

• Submersibles are primarily used for scientific exploration, deep-sea research, underwater archaeology, or filmmaking. They are often employed in areas such as marine biology, geology, or oceanography.
• Submarines have both military and civilian applications. In a military context, submarines are used for naval warfare, including patrolling, reconnaissance, and launching missiles. Some submarines are also used for intelligence gathering and special operations. Civilians submarines may be used for underwater tourism or scientific research, but they are less common.

1. Depth and Range:

• Submersibles are typically designed for specific depth ranges and may be limited to a few hundred meters or a few thousand meters. They are generally not capable of prolonged operations at great depths.
• Submarines, especially military submarines, are built to operate at significant depths, often reaching several hundred meters to even over a thousand meters. They are capable of extended missions, including staying submerged for extended periods and traveling long distances.

1. Construction:

• Submersibles are usually constructed with lighter materials, such as aluminum or fiberglass, to enhance their buoyancy and mobility. They often have transparent domes or viewports for better visibility.
• Submarines are built with strong hulls, often using steel or other sturdy materials to withstand high water pressure. They are designed to be watertight and are equipped with various systems to ensure the safety and survival of the crew.

1. Propulsion:

• Submersibles typically use electric batteries or other power sources to propel themselves. They may rely on thrusters or propellers for movement.
• Submarines employ various propulsion systems, including diesel engines for surface travel and electric batteries for submerged operations. Nuclear-powered submarines use nuclear reactors to generate steam and drive turbines, providing them with extended range and endurance underwater.

In summary, submersibles are smaller, often single-person or small crewed vehicles used for exploration and research, while submarines are larger vessels primarily used for military purposes, such as warfare and strategic missions. Submersibles are limited in depth and range, while submarines are built for extended operations at greater depths.

Now lets talk about the tragedy that happened earlier this week, various research articles has discussed warnings and concerns that were raised about OceanGate, a company that planned to take wealthy tourists on trips to explore the wreckage of the Titanic. The company faced criticism from experts both inside and outside the company who expressed concerns about the safety of its submersible craft, named Titan. OceanGate’s director of marine operations, David Lochridge, prepared a report stating that the craft needed more testing and highlighted potential dangers to passengers at extreme depths. Another warning came from 38 industry leaders, deep-sea explorers, and oceanographers who sent a letter to OceanGate’s CEO, Stockton Rush, expressing concerns about the company’s experimental approach and the potential for catastrophic problems with the Titanic mission.

The criticisms focused on Rush’s refusal to have the Titan inspected and certified by leading agencies, which would ensure it met safety standards. Lochridge’s report revealed that the craft’s viewport was only certified for depths of up to 1,300 meters, far less than the 4,000-meter depth required for Titanic trips. Despite the warnings, OceanGate did not pursue certification and dismissed Lochridge, leading to a legal battle that ended in a settlement. The experts also criticized OceanGate’s decision to forgo testing the prototypes under the supervision of a leading certification company, emphasizing the importance of third-party validation for submersible safety.

OceanGate defended its approach, arguing that certification would stifle innovation and that it would take years to get the Titan certified due to its innovative design. The company also avoided certain U.S. regulations by operating the vessel in international waters. Submersibles are largely unregulated, and the Titan, loaded onto a Canadian ship and dropped into the North Atlantic near the Titanic, does not need to register with a country or follow many vessel rules.

The article mentions previous expeditions by OceanGate to the Titanic site, which faced technical issues, including battery problems and damage to the exterior of the submersible. Despite these challenges, some individuals were able to visit the Titanic wreckage on the Titan.

The warnings and criticisms raised about OceanGate’s safety practices and refusal to pursue certification have gained attention in light of the recent disappearance of the submersible craft with five people onboard.

So, the possible causes could be more likely an implosion and not explosion, experts also indicated that led to sudden death of all the individuals on board. Additionally, Years before the tragic incident in which a tourist submersible went missing during an expedition to explore the Titanic shipwreck, concerns over safety issues were raised about the company responsible for the vessel. OceanGate, the privately held company charging $250,000 per person for the Titanic voyage, faced lawsuits and warnings from industry experts. In 2018, a professional trade group expressed concerns about OceanGate’s experimental design approach, citing potential “catastrophic” outcomes.

An employee, David Lochridge, who later sued the company, had raised safety concerns about the submersible’s design and hull testing protocol. Lochridge claimed the company could subject passengers to extreme danger. Lawsuits were also filed by customers who struggled to get refunds for canceled trips due to certification and equipment failure issues. Certification problems emerged as the Titan did not have the intended DNV-GL certification as advertised. Lochridge alleged that OceanGate refused to pay for necessary upgrades to meet safety requirements. OceanGate’s lawsuit against Lochridge emphasized that he was not an engineer, while he argued that his role was to ensure safety during operations.

Introduction: Over the years, Pakistan has witnessed a noticeable increase in the assets of its military leaders, including General Qamar Javed Bajwa and other army generals. This rise has sparked discussions and debates regarding the sources of their wealth and the implications it may have on the country’s socio-economic landscape. In this blog post, we will delve into the factors contributing to the increased assets of General Bajwa and other army generals, examining the possible reasons behind this phenomenon and its significance for Pakistan.

1. Military Service and Perks: Army generals in Pakistan hold high-ranking positions with corresponding salaries and benefits. As senior military officials, they receive substantial salaries and allowances, including housing allowances, medical benefits, and other financial incentives. These perks, combined with their long years of service, contribute to the accumulation of wealth over time.
2. Investments and Business Ventures: Many army generals, including General Bajwa, have diversified their income streams through investments and business ventures. These ventures range from real estate investments to agricultural projects and private security firms. By utilizing their financial resources and connections, army generals can enter various sectors and generate additional income, leading to an increase in their personal wealth.
3. Land and Property Ownership: Land ownership has historically played a significant role in wealth accumulation in Pakistan. Army generals, like many other individuals, have acquired land and properties over the years. As urban areas expand and property values increase, the value of their land and properties appreciates, contributing to their overall wealth growth.
4. Inheritance and Family Wealth: In some cases, the increase in assets of army generals can be attributed to inherited wealth or family connections. Military leaders often come from privileged backgrounds and may have inherited businesses or properties that form a significant part of their assets. Family wealth, combined with their own financial activities, contributes to the growth of their overall wealth.
5. Lack of Transparency and Accountability: The lack of transparency and accountability surrounding the financial activities of military leaders in Pakistan is a concern. Critics argue that the absence of a robust system for monitoring and scrutinizing the financial activities of army generals makes it challenging to ascertain the sources of their wealth. This lack of transparency can erode public trust and raise questions about the fairness and equity of wealth distribution in the country.

Conclusion: The rise in assets of General Bajwa and other army generals in Pakistan is influenced by various factors, including their military service, investments, property ownership, and inheritance. However, the lack of transparency and accountability surrounding their financial activities raises concerns about the fairness and equity of wealth distribution. To address these concerns, Pakistan needs to establish a transparent system for monitoring and scrutinizing the financial activities of military leaders, ensuring that their wealth aligns with their official income and legitimate means.

Disclaimer: This blog post provides a general overview of the factors contributing to the increase in assets of General Bajwa and other army generals in Pakistan. It is important to note that specific details regarding their personal finances and sources of wealth may not be publicly available. The information presented here is based on available knowledge and should not be considered an exhaustive analysis.

In recent times, Pakistan has been grappling with a myriad of challenges, both domestic and international. From a struggling economy to mounting security concerns, the country has its fair share of problems to deal with. One issue that has been at the forefront of public discourse is corruption. Pakistan has long been plagued by corruption, and it is widely recognized as one of the biggest hurdles to progress and development in the country.

The latest development in the ongoing fight against corruption is the release of the Toshakhana gifts record since 2002. The Toshakhana is a repository of gifts that are given to the President, Prime Minister, Ministers, Governors, and other high-ranking officials of the country. The record of gifts given and received has been made public for the first time since 2002. This move is significant as it will provide much-needed transparency in the government’s affairs and help to root out corruption.

The Toshakhana record shows that gifts worth billions of rupees have been given and received by the high-ranking officials of the country. These gifts range from luxury cars and watches to precious gems and jewelry. It is worth noting that these gifts were given by both foreign and local individuals, and some of them were received by the officials in their official capacity.

One of the most notable entries in the Toshakhana record is the gift of a gold-plated assault rifle given to former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif by the Saudi Arabian government. The rifle is valued at approximately Rs 65 lakh and was given to Mr. Sharif during his visit to Saudi Arabia in 2017. The Toshakhana record also shows that former President Asif Ali Zardari received a diamond necklace worth Rs 44 lakh from a Saudi prince.

The release of the Toshakhana gifts record is a welcome move in the fight against corruption. It will provide the public with much-needed transparency in the government’s affairs and help to hold high-ranking officials accountable for their actions. The record will also serve as a deterrent to those who might be tempted to engage in corrupt practices.

However, the release of the Toshakhana record is only the first step in the fight against corruption. The government must also take steps to ensure that those who engage in corrupt practices are held accountable for their actions. The country’s legal system must be strengthened to ensure that corrupt officials are prosecuted and punished. The government must also take steps to promote transparency and accountability in all aspects of governance.

The release of the Toshakhana gifts record is a significant development in the fight against corruption in Pakistan. It will provide much-needed transparency in the government’s affairs and help to hold high-ranking officials accountable for their actions. However, the government must take further steps to strengthen the legal system and promote transparency and accountability in all aspects of governance. Only then can Pakistan hope to root out corruption and make progress towards a brighter future.

The release of the Toshakhana gifts record since 2002 has been met with mixed reactions from the public. While some have welcomed the move as a step towards transparency and accountability, others have criticized it as a selective disclosure of information. Many have pointed out that the record only covers a limited period and does not provide a complete picture of the gifts received by the officials.

Despite these criticisms, the release of the Toshakhana record is a positive step towards promoting transparency in the country’s governance. It has shed light on the extravagant gifts received by high-ranking officials, some of which are worth millions of rupees. The record includes entries for luxury vehicles, expensive watches, jewelry, and other high-value items.

It is not only the monetary value of the gifts that is concerning, but also the potential conflicts of interest they may create. The officials who receive these gifts may feel obliged to reciprocate in some way, which could lead to corrupt practices. The Toshakhana record has highlighted the need for clearer rules and guidelines on the acceptance of gifts by officials in Pakistan.

The release of the Toshakhana record is also a reminder of the importance of holding public officials accountable for their actions. Corruption has long been a pervasive problem in Pakistan, and it is often the poorest and most vulnerable who suffer the most from it. By providing transparency in the gifts received by officials, the government is taking a step towards addressing this issue.

However, the release of the Toshakhana record is only the first step towards combating corruption in Pakistan. The government must also take other measures to ensure accountability and transparency in governance. This includes strengthening anti-corruption laws, increasing the independence of anti-corruption bodies, and providing greater protection for whistleblowers.

Furthermore, the government must also address the underlying causes of corruption, such as poor governance, lack of transparency, and weak institutions. This will require significant reforms in various areas, including tax collection, public procurement, and the administration of justice.

The Toshakhana gifts record since 2002, which has been made public in Pakistan, provides a detailed account of the gifts received by Pakistani officials over the years. These gifts include everything from luxury vehicles and expensive watches to precious gems and jewelry. Some of the notable gifts listed in the record include:

1. A gold-plated assault rifle: Former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif received a gold-plated assault rifle worth approximately Rs 65 lakh from the Saudi Arabian government during his visit to Saudi Arabia in 2017.
2. A diamond necklace: Former President Asif Ali Zardari received a diamond necklace worth Rs 44 lakh from a Saudi prince.
3. Luxury vehicles: The record shows that several officials received luxury vehicles as gifts, including former Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani, who received a Land Cruiser worth Rs 13.5 million, and former President Pervez Musharraf, who received a BMW car worth Rs 14.5 million.
4. Expensive watches: Several officials were also gifted expensive watches, including former Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi, who received a watch worth Rs 5.5 million, and former Chief Minister of Punjab Shehbaz Sharif, who received a watch worth Rs 3.5 million.
5. Precious gems and jewelry: The Toshakhana record shows that officials received a range of precious gems and jewelry as gifts, including diamond rings, necklaces, and bracelets.

It is worth noting that some of these gifts were received by officials in their official capacity, while others were received as personal gifts. However, the Toshakhana record has highlighted the need for clearer rules and guidelines on the acceptance of gifts by officials in Pakistan.

The release of the Toshakhana gifts record has also raised questions about the potential conflicts of interest that could arise from accepting such gifts. Officials who receive gifts from individuals or countries may feel obliged to reciprocate in some way, which could lead to corrupt practices. The record has underscored the need for stricter regulations on the acceptance of gifts by officials and greater transparency in the country’s governance.

In conclusion, the Toshakhana gifts record since 2002 provides a detailed account of the gifts received by Pakistani officials, including luxury cars, watches, and jewelry. While some of these gifts were received in their official capacity, others were received as personal gifts. The release of this record highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability in the country’s governance and stricter regulations on the acceptance of gifts by officials.